Other examples:
Book Tracking - it would be nice to see how many books I've read this year without having to manually count
Tasks this week - a count give a quick overview of whether the week is busy or not
Inventory - Saving a list of anything in Tana, it would be useful to have a count of items
I'm honestly, baffled that this isn't higher in requests. Not that this is a needed feature per se, but rather that it's such an obvious extension of Tana.
Two years ago when Tana came out, my understanding was that this was the projected direction of things; that this was essentially what set Tana apart. Tana didn't build supertags so we could all have fun adding unnecessary details to everything. I was under the impression that Tana was built with the coming importance of AI in mind and that supertags were an important feature because they added context to the connections between nodes which would allow the AI to be more informed on not just the fact that two things are related but how they are related.
So to provide that valuable context to the AI it seems only obvious that the next step would be to use that to then project possible connections between nodes. This solves two enormous problems from pkm systems:
This feature is probably one of the most valuable features Tana could create. And Tana is in a better position to achieve this than the hit or miss "related content" that Mem, Reflect Notes, etc offer, because Tana has more structured data and context.
I hope to see this feature soon. And I hope to see more people in the community talking about the value of this. It's really a make or break feature for the future of the app, IMHO.