Had exactly the same thought! It feels redundant to have a Supertag with a plain field labelled 'My search" and the field value being a single search node also titled "My Search" that you then need to expand to actually see the search results.
It also means you need to user the GRANDPARENT search operator in those search nodes if you want to perform the search based on the identity of the Supertag that owns the field search.
This took me a while to figure out. My initial instinct was to look for a "Search" type of Field to add to my supertag content template.
Found myself wanting this, came here to see if it was already suggested.
My specific use case.
I have an
#employeesupertag withStart dateandEnd datefields. I would like the title to be something like this:{$name} {Start date|?} → {End date|?}And if the
{End date}field is empty, I would like to hide the→.Syntax-wise, something like this would seem good to me:
{$name} {Start date|?} {End date| "→" ?} {End date|?}Where the
{End date| "→" ?}implies that if theEnd datefield is not empty, then show a string containing the→character.