@Olli Tiainen @Andric Tham wouldn't mentioned "connection between supertag instance fields information" be contained within the field title and description?
@Olli Tiainen @Andric Tham wouldn't mentioned "connection between supertag instance fields information" be contained within the field title and description?
Something Went Wrong
In simple relationships, yes, such as:
But in more complex relationships, this doesn't work anymore:
It doesn't work because field titles don't capture the context of these relationships (the edges). For example, Vitamin D (#nutrient) reduces osteoporosis risk (#symptom). But the context is that this is because Vitamin D helps the intestines absorb calcium from your food. However, neither the fields nor the field titles can capture this explanation of the connection. Instead, the information must be recorded either "under" the medicine or the symptom node, where it doesn't directly explain the relationship and isn't available bidirectionally through the fields or even via backlinks.