I understand Headings are always open by default because we should understand a heading's content as actually the heading's PARENT NODE content, right? The heading is only organizing the content. That is why (I think) you chose to always expand them, displaying their contents when you open the parent node.
Being consistent with this, shouldn't the References section of the PARENT NODE consider nodes under headings as if they were already mentioned in the PARENT NODE (and therefore exclude them from the References section)?
You don't have permission to do this.
You're going a bit too fast! Take a break and try again in a moment.
Something went wrong! Please reload the page and try again.
I understand Headings are always open by default because we should understand a heading's content as actually the heading's PARENT NODE content, right? The heading is only organizing the content. That is why (I think) you chose to always expand them, displaying their contents when you open the parent node.
Being consistent with this, shouldn't the References section of the PARENT NODE consider nodes under headings as if they were already mentioned in the PARENT NODE (and therefore exclude them from the References section)?