Skip to main content
tana
Product Company Community App Get early access
Community
Search
Log In
Log In Sign Up
John Hildenbiddle

John Hildenbiddle

Joined Feb 25, 2025 Last seen May 11, 2025
Posts 1 Comments 2

⁨John Hildenbiddle⁩'s Posts

Newest Top
Newest Top
John Hildenbiddle John Hildenbiddle Apr 2, 2025

Allow filtering based on existence / type / contents of child nodes

Actions

Explain the problem as you see it

I am unable to filter nodes based on the existence / type / contents of child nodes. The result is that I am unable to properly filter out information I do not need.

Why is this a problem for you?

I would like to search for meetings that contain notes. This could be done multiple ways depending on how meeting notes are taken:

  • Search for #meeting nodes that do not contain child nodes (fields excluded).
  • Search for #meeting nodes that contain a specific #supertag
  • Search for #meeting nodes that contain a node that is not DONE
  • Search for #meeting nodes that contain the string "Notes"

None of these searches are possible today. As a result, it is unnecessary time consuming for me find specific meeting notes because I am forced to navigate through all of my #meeting nodes.

Suggest a solution

Ideally, this functionality would be made available using a new node contents operator like CONTAINS or HAS CHILD which accepts nothing, a tag, a string, etc. as a parameter. The query only has to match a single item while should address performance concerns.

If the above solution is not possible, there are a few other approaches that could work:

  1. If on child created and on child removed events were available at the supertag level, a check could (presumably) be performed after each child was created/removed which could then set a field value for reference.
  2. The system could offer new node content operators for specific queries like HAS CHILDREN, HAS CHILD [TODO|DONE|NOT DONE], HAS CHILD TAG, etc.

This feels like basic functionality that I was surprised to find missing from Tana.

Thanks in advanced for your consideration.

0 ⁨0⁩ ⁨comments⁩