Explain the problem as you see it
Lack of URL Embedding: URLs cannot be directly embedded into the page for a seamless and visually appealing display.
Limited Display Options: There are no customizable formats for how URLs are shown, making them appear plain and unappealing.
No Aesthetic Presentation: URLs are displayed as raw links, which can look cluttered and disrupt the overall design of the page.
Inability to Edit Display Title: Users cannot change the display title of a URL to something more meaningful or relevant, forcing them to rely on the original link text.
Missing Mention-Like Functionality: Unlike tools like Notion, Tana lacks advanced features to showcase URLs in dynamic and versatile ways, such as cards, previews, or inline mentions.
Why is this a problem for you?
ack of URL Embedding: Without the ability to embed URLs directly, users are forced to rely on raw links that disrupt the flow of content. This makes the page less interactive and visually engaging, reducing its usability, especially for users who want to integrate external resources seamlessly into their workspace.
Limited Display Options: A plain display format for URLs limits creativity and personalization. Users cannot tailor how links appear to suit their needs or the context of their work, which can make pages feel cluttered and less professional.
No Aesthetic Presentation: Raw URLs are often long, complicated, and unattractive. Displaying them directly can overwhelm the page visually, making it harder for users to focus on the content. This is especially problematic when managing multiple links, as it can lead to a disorganized and unappealing interface.
Inability to Edit Display Title: Users cannot rename URLs to make them more meaningful or relevant to the context. This lack of customization forces users to rely on the original link text, which may not be descriptive or intuitive, leading to confusion and inefficiency.
Missing Mention-Like Functionality: Without dynamic mention-like features, Tana falls behind competitors like Notion in terms of usability and versatility. Mention-like functionality allows URLs to be displayed as cards, previews, or inline links, which not only enhances aesthetics but also improves navigation and user experience. The absence of this feature makes Tana less appealing for users seeking a modern, streamlined workspace.
Suggest a solution
Enable URL Embedding: Introduce functionality that allows URLs to be embedded directly into the page. This could include displaying links as interactive cards or previews that integrate seamlessly into the workspace.
Offer Customizable Display Options: Provide users with multiple formats for displaying URLs, such as inline text, cards, or thumbnails. This flexibility ensures links can be presented in a way that aligns with the user's needs and aesthetic preferences.
Improve Aesthetic Presentation: Automatically generate visually appealing previews for URLs, including website titles, descriptions, and thumbnails. This makes links more engaging and reduces the clutter caused by raw URLs.
Allow Custom Display Titles: Add a feature that lets users rename URLs with custom display titles. This allows links to be labeled in a meaningful way, enhancing clarity and organization within the workspace.
Implement Mention-Like Functionality: Introduce advanced mention-like features similar to Notion, where URLs can be displayed in different formats (e.g., inline mentions, cards, or embedded previews). This would make URLs dynamic and versatile, enabling users to interact with them more effectively.
Seamless Editing and Updating: Ensure users can easily edit, update, or remove embedded links without breaking the workflow. This improves usability and ensures the workspace remains adaptable to changing needs.
By implementing these solutions, Tana can enhance its URL handling capabilities, making it more user-friendly, visually appealing, and competitive with tools like Notion.