Explain the problem as you see it
While Tana is incredibly powerful, mastering its features and designing effective, personalized systems (supertags, fields, workflows) can have a steep learning curve and often requires referencing external documentation or community examples.
Why is this a problem for you?
Remembering how everything works together and being able to visualize the conected ness of fields and supertags and extended tags just to make a basic system is difficult. Forget trying to remember how all the nested functionality works.
Suggest a solution
If this is how the AI is suppose to behave then it needs some fine tuning.
Instant In-App Guidance: Provide AI-powered help for Tana features directly within the workspace, making learning more intuitive.
Smart Design Suggestions: Equip the AI to offer advice on Tana best practices for structuring information, with user flexibility to customize.
Collaborative Schema Building: Enable users to describe their needs and have the AI assist in outlining and creating the necessary supertags and fields, referencing existing user schema for consistency.
User Experience Note: I've found great success working manually with an external AI (Gemini) and Tana's help docs to develop my schema. It’s shown how helpful AI partnership can be, and native integration would make this accessible and powerful for all users.