Ken Blackman Feb 3, 2025 Agreed. Much of the query functionality seems like it naturally could and should be recursive. My use cases: Find nodes that are CHILD OF a node that contains the word “Related” and is a CHILD OF the target node, ie: Concept 1 Related @Concept 2 @Concept 3 Find nodes that are linked to by a node that contains the word Related and is a child of the target node, ie: Concept 1 Related: @Concept 2, @Concept 3 And perhaps most usefully, find nodes that are in an instance of >related field in the target node, ie: Concept 1 >related:: @Concept 2 @Concept 3
Agreed. Much of the query functionality seems like it naturally could and should be recursive. My use cases:
Find nodes that are CHILD OF a node that contains the word “Related” and is a CHILD OF the target node, ie:
Concept 1 Related @Concept 2 @Concept 3Find nodes that are linked to by a node that contains the word Related and is a child of the target node, ie:
Concept 1 Related: @Concept 2, @Concept 3And perhaps most usefully, find nodes that are in an instance of >related field in the target node, ie:
Concept 1 >related:: @Concept 2 @Concept 3