Explain the problem as you see it
Currently, for Tana AI features, the only option is to use OpenAI's GPT.
Why is this a problem for you?
I don't think that GPT is the best AI LLM solution and I'm preferring to use other options.
Suggest a solution
Allow a user to select from different AI models, such as Anthropic's Claude 2, and Inflection's Inflection-1 that will be used for the AI features. Potentially even enable greater customizability and let a user choose the specific API calls that are sent with AI commands to allow for a user to use and fine tune their own model if preferred.
6 Comments
The larger context window for Claude is a huge advantage for working in Tana
Do we know if there's a limit, or whether there is an official API planned soon? Afaik, the API is pretty much unofficial, and also doesn't provide endpoints like openAI does
I would also like to see the integration of the Perplexity API.
Has taken on new significance in recent days (March 2024) with the release of Claude 3, which I'd love to use inside Tana!
Any updates on this please
Even just Claude 3 is fine
Claude 3 is great, but I found Gemini 1.5 Pro even better. (I use it via poe.com.)
Would be great if Tana permitted openrouter.ai as an API-interface to access different language models.
Here's an explanation how harpa.ai uses openrouter, for instance: https://harpa.ai/guides/openrouter-connection-in-harpa-ai